Let’s get real on Terrorism

by Whaleoil on January 1, 2010 · 34 comments

I for one am heartily sick of all the extra secu­rity par­tic­u­larly on domes­tic flights. The ter­ror­ists are win­ning if we have to go to all this expense and bother. Now in the US it is even worse after the Pants­bomber tried to hijack a plane. The TSA has even tried to arrest some blog­gers and steal take their hard drives.

But let’s put some per­spec­tive into the sub­ject. Let’s face the game changed with 9/11. Now if you are on a plane that gets hijacked you may as well go for the hijack­ers, either way dead is dead. It is now assumed that the trip is one way and into the ground. I know I would rather die on my feet than sit­ting patiently in seat while crazy f**ked up peo­ple try to do some dam­age. But what are your real chances of being involved in an air­liner hijacking.

For­tu­nately Boing­Bo­ing has answered that for us. As you can see we are spend­ing bil­lions of dol­lars on a prob­lem that sta­tis­ti­cally is non-existent.

More chance of being hit by lightening than being hijacked

More chance of being hit by light­en­ing than being hijacked

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Related Posts:

{ 33 comments }

Theresaj January 1, 2010 at 7:58 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Who is going to get real on ter­ror­ism , when so many are so totally com­mit­ted to not get­ting real about islam.

Bill No Name January 1, 2010 at 8:29 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

His nuts were a mess apparently.

Amerikiwee January 1, 2010 at 2:06 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Hope­fully no repro­duc­tion for him then!

medusa1 January 1, 2010 at 6:40 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

And 72 dis­ap­pointed virgins?

reid January 1, 2010 at 8:18 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

It’s a valid point and has been since the over-reaction started in 2002.

Back then, a lot of peo­ple talked about how nec­es­sary it all was. Espe­cially those con­ser­v­a­tives with a strong secu­rity bent which I am and have. How­ever I’ve always seen it as an over-reaction from day one.

Good to see oth­ers of the same ilk finally come around to my way of think­ing, just a shame it has taken this long for the penny to drop.

michael January 1, 2010 at 8:55 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Here’s a question,who’s the real ter­ror­ists?
By Robert Scheer and Iftekhar A Khan
Thanks to the polit­i­cal oppor­tunism of the cur­rent com­man­der in chief the Afghanistan war is still with­out end or log­i­cal pur­pose. Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s own top national secu­rity adviser has stated that there are fewer than 100 al-Qaida mem­bers in Afghanistan and that they are not capa­ble of launch­ing attacks. What super­heroes they must be, then, to require 100,000 U.S. troops to con­tain them.
The hawks of the mil­i­tary indus­trial com­plex and national secu­rity advis­ers who war-game with pub­lic lives and resources in alien lands dic­tate US poli­cies. Would Lock­heed Mar­tin, man­u­fac­turer of Hell­fire mis­siles and Gen­eral Atom­ics, man­u­fac­turer of Preda­tor and Reaper drones that fire these mis­siles want the war to end? Would defence con­trac­tors Black­wa­ter (World­wide Xe), Dyn­Corp or Kre­stal and recon­struc­tion giants Hal­libur­ton and Bech­tel want the flames of war to extin­guish? No, because war is their indus­try and killing their busi­ness. Such cor­po­ra­tions, on the other end, finance politi­cians’ elec­tion cam­paigns. So wars are lucra­tive cor­po­rate projects.

reid January 1, 2010 at 9:34 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

the Afghanistan war is still with­out end or log­i­cal pur­pose. Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s own top national secu­rity adviser has stated that there are fewer than 100 al-Qaida mem­bers in Afghanistan”

michael, that’s because they’re all in Pak­istan, in par­tic­u­lar Pash­tun province. The rea­son they’re in Afghanistan is because they can­not let Pak­istan de-stabilise to the point where the mad-Mullahs get hold of the nukes. I under­stand actu­ally that if such an event looks like hap­pen­ing the US has a plan all ready to imple­ment, to seize them, and I wholly approve of that. How­ever that’s a worst-case action.

If the US leaves Afghanistan they give Al-Qaida a chance to re-establish a base of oper­a­tions from which it would then de-stabilise Pak­istani pol­i­tics to the point where the mad Mul­lahs would be able to take over. At the moment, they remain con­fined to and sup­pressed in Pash­tun pre­cisely because of the US oper­a­tions in Afghanistan.

michael January 2, 2010 at 1:27 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

reid:“The rea­son they’re in Afghanistan is because they can­not let Pak­istan de-stabilise to the point where the mad-Mullahs get hold of the nukes.” mad Mullahs?it wasn’t to long ago that the Amer­i­cans were win­ing and din­ning them in the states.The plan to remove the nukes has been on the table for a num­ber of years.Ever heard of Full Spec­trum Dom­i­na­tion or Amer­i­can Hege­mony, well those poor bastards(Afghans) are get­ting a taste of it and they don’t like it.There is a say­ing ” Afghanistan the grave yard of empires.” Quite frankly I think the Amer­i­cans have bit­ten off more than they can chew.Those mad Mul­lahs have been play­ing this game before Colum­bus dis­cov­ered America.

reid January 2, 2010 at 4:02 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

michael yes I have heard of those terms and I also agree with every­thing you say but can’t see your point.

Are you sug­gest­ing the US gives up because it’s a tough fight and meekly sur­ren­ders to the mad mul­lahs with all atten­dant consequences?

michael January 2, 2010 at 6:29 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Have you ever heard of Viet­nam? this could be Obama’s Vietnam

caleb January 1, 2010 at 9:37 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

get a grip micheal. they are just prac­tic­ing, so that when ww4 comes around, we will defi­nately win.

michael January 2, 2010 at 1:36 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Who’s financ­ing this war caleb?they have to loan money from the Chi­nese and the Amer­i­can pub­lic are knee deep in shit pay­ing that loan off, “we will defi­nately win” get real caleb you’re not buy­ing into that delu­sion are you.

Theresaj January 2, 2010 at 1:43 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

You are right Michael that they are cor­po­rate wars. Because of this they are designed to go on and on and on. They are never intended to be a ”suc­cess.” No neat end­ings planned here. As long as they go on , the peo­ple who are mak­ing mil­lions out of them , con­tinue to make mil­lions out of them. Just at a glance this New Year , it looks like the Yemen is next.

michael January 2, 2010 at 1:55 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Obama Takes ‘War on Ter­ror’ to Yemen

By Simon Tisdall

Decem­ber 29, 2009 “The Guardian” — – Barack Obama’s steely vow to hunt down all those respon­si­ble for the attempted bomb­ing of an Amer­i­can air­liner on Christ­mas Day has left a cru­cial ques­tion unan­swered: whether it was his per­sonal order to US mil­i­tary forces to attack two sus­pected al-Qaida bases in Yemen with cruise mis­siles on 17 Decem­ber that trig­gered a “revenge” ter­ror­ist oper­a­tion against the North­west Air­lines plane one week later.

Accord­ing to a report aired on 18 Decem­ber by the Amer­i­can ABC News net­work and not denied by the White House, US and Yemeni gov­ern­ment forces jointly tar­geted al-Qaida train­ing camps in the Arhab dis­trict, 60km north-east of the cap­i­tal, Sana’a on 17 Decem­ber. Another alleged camp in the vil­lage of al-Maajala, in Abyan, 480km south-east of Sana’a, was also hit after US offi­cials deter­mined “an immi­nent attack against a US asset was being planned” there.

Both tar­gets were bombed repeat­edly from the air by Yemeni air force planes. Sub­se­quent offi­cial esti­mates said about 35 mil­i­tants were killed. But Yemeni oppo­si­tion spokes­men said a total of between 60 and 120 peo­ple had died dur­ing bom­bard­ments of the two tar­gets and a third loca­tion. They said many of those killed were civil­ians, includ­ing women and chil­dren. They denied the vil­lages con­tained al-Qaida camps.

Tele­vi­sion pic­tures broad­cast from Yemen by the Arab news chan­nel al-Jazeera on 18 Decem­ber showed dozens of bod­ies cov­ered in sheets.

caleb January 2, 2010 at 5:39 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

mus­lims have hated israel and the west for a long time.
i doubt the mike moore approach would have every­one hold­ing hands.

there is no doubt defence is a big part of the us gdp.

im just not sure about the un being the mid­dle ground…u want?

michael January 2, 2010 at 6:00 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

The price of war with Iraq…remember they’re fight­ing five wars in Mus­lim countries

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OT5uw1Fb_0

michael January 2, 2010 at 6:56 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

caleb:“there is no doubt defence is a big part of the us gdp.”

With a cen­sus of slightly over 300 mil­lion in a world of almost seven bil­lion peo­ple, the U.S. accounts for over 40 per­cent of offi­cially acknowl­edged world­wide gov­ern­ment mil­i­tary spend­ing with a pop­u­la­tion that is only 4 per­cent of that of the earth’s. A 10–1 disparity.

In addi­tion to its 1,445,000 active duty ser­vice mem­bers, the Pen­ta­gon can and does call upon 1.2 mil­lion National Guard and other reserve com­po­nents. As many as 30% of troops that have served in Afghanistan and Iraq are mobi­lized reservists. The Army National Guard has acti­vated over 400,000 sol­diers since the war in Afghanistan began and in March of 2009 approx­i­mately 125,000 National Guard and other reserve per­son­nel were on active duty.

The Defense Depart­ment also has over 800,000 civil­ian employ­ees at home and deployed world­wide. The Pen­ta­gon, then, has more than 3.5 mil­lion peo­ple at its imme­di­ate dis­posal exclud­ing pri­vate mil­i­tary contractors.

After allot­ting over a tril­lion dol­lars for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq alone and pack­ing off more than two mil­lion of its cit­i­zens to the two nations, the U.S. mil­i­tary estab­lish­ment and peace prize pres­i­dent have already laid the ground­work for yet more wars. Boe­ing, Raytheon and Gen­eral Elec­tric won’t be kept waiting.

michael January 2, 2010 at 7:02 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

caleb:“muslims have hated israel and the west for a long time.”

Their was never an issue between Mus­lims and Jews until the Zion­ists gate crashed the party.Then the shit hit the fan.

Flashman January 2, 2010 at 5:15 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

A clas­sic symp­tom of an empire in decline is that in con­trast to its easy expan­sion years, it begins self-consciously to try too hard.

As was the case with Rome in 302 AD head­ing off over the Euphrates to “do a Tra­jan” on the Per­sians, so in 2002 AD we see Amer­ica trundling, bump­ing and Jdaming into Afghanistan to “do a Georgie Pat­ton” on the Taliban.

Fas­ci­nat­ing how real­ity so often mir­rors history.

Theresaj January 3, 2010 at 8:35 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Michael , Have you read the koran and the hadiths? Mus­lim hatred is no new thing.

michael January 3, 2010 at 9:43 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

There­saj, Have you read the Bible?theirs some cruel and nasty shit in their. Also have you read the Jew­ish Tal­mud?
Some teach­ings of the Jew­ish Talmud:The Tal­mud per­mits steal­ing from Non-Jews

Simeon Haddarsen,fol. 56-D
“When the Mes­siah comes every Jew will have 2800 Gen­tile slaves.” sounds like the Arabs an their virgins.

Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b
If you eat with a Gentile,it is the same as eat­ing with a dog.

San­hedrin 59a
“Mur­der­ing Gen­tiles is like killing a wild animal.”

Eru­bin 21b
Who­ever dis­obeys the rab­bis deserves DEATH and will be pun­ished by being boiled in hot excre­ment in hell.

Git­tin 57a.
“Jesus is in hell being boiled in “hot excrement.”

Midrasch Tal­pioth p225-L
Jaho­vah cre­ated the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is an ani­mal in human form,and com­manded to serve the Jew day and night.

Theresaj January 4, 2010 at 3:44 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Of couse the Jew­ish books and the Bible have some seri­ous writ­ings ..islam is a rip off of pre­vi­ous or then held beliefs..Nothing new in islam..but Jews and Chris­tians are not ter­ror­is­ing the world.and want­ing to take the world back to the stone age..Muslims are.

michael January 4, 2010 at 7:02 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Theresaj:“Jews and Chris­tians are not ter­ror­is­ing the world.and want­ing to take the world back to the stone age..Muslims are.”

Have you not learnt any­thing Theresaj?The mus­lims are not invad­ing, the five fronts(wars) are in Mus­lim coun­tries they’re the one’s who are being invaded.With the end of the Cold War another enemy had to fill the gap left by the soviets,hence “The War on Terror“corporate Media spins the sto­ries that man­u­fac­tures the con­sent for war and the gullible just lap it up. If you were watch­ing the news this evening and last night,nothing was said what trig­gered the air­line attack or exactly whats hap­pen­ing in Yemen,try doing a lit­tle research before mak­ing a ridicules comment“Jews and Chris­tians are not ter­ror­is­ing the world.and want­ing to take the world back to the stone age..Muslims are.”

Theresaj January 4, 2010 at 9:10 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Michael..you may think my views are ridicu­lous …I think yours are naive and com­fort hug­ging. If we want to get tech­ni­cal about inva­sion , how long have all the so called mus­lim coun­tries been mus­lims coun­tries? Not long by history’s stan­dards.
Immi­gra­tion is a form of inva­sion. What do you know about mod­ern day Britain? Try immi­grat­ing to a so called mus­lim country..they won’t want you if you are not muslim…muslim coun­tries only accept mus­lim refugees and then not that many of them.
I lived in a mus­lim coun­try for about six years…it felt like about 60 years…All I could say when I got back was that it was like ”liv­ing in the mud at the bot­tom of the pond.” Every­one was fright­ened , cowed and wary…brainwashed and hope­lessly uninformed…..people reg­u­larly disappeared…corruption and hypocrisy were every­where. Have you ever lived in an islamic coun­try? Some­how, I doubt it.

michael January 5, 2010 at 4:07 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Theresaj:“Have you ever lived in an islamic coun­try? Some­how, I doubt it.

No I haven’t nor have I been to the moon,but I know I would have trou­ble breath­ing thats because their is plenty of info on the subject.“lived in a mus­lim coun­try for about six years“If it was that bad why did it take that long to fig­ure out that it was like ”liv­ing in the mud at the bot­tom of the pond.” Here’s a question?the coun­tries Amer­ica deals with,do those regimes give a shit about their people?Do the Amer­i­cans care?like fuck they do on both accounts,they’re using those cor­rupt lead­ers the same way the regimes use their own peo­ple for gain and control.Here’s another ques­tion why were their a lot of euro­peans immi­grat­ing here in the 1800s? To get away from the tyranny in their on coun­tries and for a bet­ter life.

Whaleoil January 5, 2010 at 4:50 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I bet your voice has a high pitched whine to it and is really annoy­ing after about 3 minutes.

michael January 5, 2010 at 5:00 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

whaleoil:“I bet your voice has a high pitched whine to it and is really annoy­ing after about 3 minutes.”

Only to peo­ple like you whale and Theresaj,you have your opin­ions I have my or are we not allowed to think out­side the square .

Theresaj January 5, 2010 at 9:13 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Michael ,
I could tell from your writ­ing that you had never lived in an islamic coun­try. The points you are mak­ing are valid about the five or so wars but my point is that you are see­ing only a small part of the pic­ture. The mus­lims are win­ning the demo­graphic war and ulti­mately , this is the only war to win. The repro­duc­tion rates in west­ern coun­tries are so low..the mus­lim repro­duc­tion rates are sky high..ten chil­dren is about the norm. Many of these end up in orphan­ages but that is another topic. There are var­i­ous videos on the net about this. Here in ChCh , the mus­lims are breed­ing at about 6/8 times the rest of the pop­u­la­tion. I assume that is about the same in other parts of NZ.
Greece , Italy , France , the UK etc.. are all being over­run by mus­lims who as per usual , have no inten­tion of inte­grat­ing. The EU is plan­ning to bring in 50 mil­lion Africans , many of whom will be mus­lim.
In 1980 , mus­lim lead­ers said “We will not need to take Europe by the Sword , we shall take Europe with our chil­dren.” Out­breed­ing is their stated war stat­egy of choice.
.

michael January 5, 2010 at 10:08 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Theresaj:“The repro­duc­tion rates in west­ern coun­tries are so low..the mus­lim repro­duc­tion rates are sky high..ten chil­dren is about the norm.”

Reminds me of the big Catholic fam­i­lies in their hey­day ‚my grand par­ents had twelve and the aver­age my uncles and aun­ties had is around about six. So… the point is to start increas­ing the population,I’ll try and keep my end up if thats all it takes.Frankly I couldn’t give a shit about whats hap­pen­ing in Europe.But theirs a prob­lem with what you’re saying,I know sev­eral mus­lim fam­i­lies here and none of them have large families,so whats their problem?

Theresaj January 5, 2010 at 8:00 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

They are not islamic enough..You may not be both­ered by what is hap­pen­ing in Europe but it will affect you espe­cially if you are young…Our pop­u­la­tion is grow­ing rapidly as peo­ple from Europe and Britain see this as a place to flee to. More Aussies will come here too for the same reasons..they con­stantly cam­paign against the build­ing of mosques..Cairns , the Swan Val­ley in the Perth area, a huge mosque planned for Auburn , west­ern Syd­ney which will mean the demo­li­tion of his­toric buildings…many Aussies can­not com­pre­hend the naivete of NZers but I think that NZers have been delib­er­atly kept in the dark.
Are you famil­iar with the huge mosque being planned for London?..very near the Olympic build­ings so islamic supremacy in the UK is beamed around the world..In this past year parts of Britain have almost descended into war…Don’t expect to read much about all this in your local papers.
If you want to know more about how the British feel about what has hap­pened in their coun­try , you can read the BNP site. Indige­nous Britains will soon be a minor­ity in their own very crowded country.

michael January 5, 2010 at 11:14 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Its called xeno­pho­bia com­mon through­out the world,more peo­ple are head­ing to Aus­tralia from here than vice-versa.The “lucky coun­try” has attracted peo­ple from all walks of life which gen­er­ates a cli­mate of racial big­otry thats been going on before Mus­lims set­tled there. Lets be honest,if the British stayed out of these coun­tries instead of rip­ping every­thing off that wasn’t tied down,maybe the sit­u­a­tion might be different.But if they didn’t another euro­pean coun­try would have.Here we have Amer­i­can impe­ri­al­ism which is course for concern,its cre­ated eco­nomic and polit­i­cal refugees which become our problem.

GNZ January 6, 2010 at 7:47 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Michael,
Yes the sit­u­a­tion would be dif­fer­ent – but not in a bet­ter way.
Aus­trala­sia would make Africa look like a par­adise in terms of civil wars health stan­dards polit­i­cal sta­bil­ity and most other things that mat­ter – rather like before the british came to this area except with much bet­ter meth­ods of killing.

michael January 7, 2010 at 11:29 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

GNZ:” Yes the sit­u­a­tion would be dif­fer­ent – but not in a bet­ter way. ”

The dif­fer­ence is only speculation,what has hap­pened here is part of our history.Health stan­dards polit­i­cal sta­bil­ity makes liv­ing in this coun­try par­adise com­pared to other coun­tries less fortunate.

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: